Case Study 03 · Custom Software

Several cities, several factories, one operations platform

Branches in several Indian cities, multiple production centres, a dealer network placing orders, and an HR function running alongside all of it. One cloud platform now carries the whole operational workflow.

🇮🇳 Client: Leading Plywood Manufacturer, India Stack: PHP · MySQL · Cloud Hosting
Multi-city
branches unified on one platform
Multi-centre
production reporting across factories
Direct
dealer ordering, no transcription step
Cloud
one system reachable from every site

Situation

A manufacturer whose operations were spread across the map

The client is a leading plywood manufacturer in India, with branches across multiple Indian cities and multiple production centres. They sell through a dealer network, they run factories that report production, and they employ the people who staff both.

Each of those is a system in its own right. Run separately — and in most manufacturing businesses of this size they are run separately — the head office spends its week assembling a picture rather than acting on one.

Problem

Four separate operations, no single platform

  1. Dealer orders arrived through people. Every order that passes through a phone call or a message before it reaches a system is an order that can be mis-heard, mis-typed, or simply forgotten in a busy hour.
  2. Production reporting was per-centre. Multiple production centres each reporting in their own format means head office is reconciling formats before it can even begin comparing performance.
  3. Documents lived wherever they were created. Specifications, certificates and site photographs on individual machines and in individual inboxes are documents the organisation does not really own.
  4. HR ran on paper across several cities. Leave applications, onboarding, resignations, payslips and incentive calculations, all handled locally and none of them visible centrally.

The company was not short of information. It was short of one place to put it.

Implication

The cost of coordination that happens by hand

Manual coordination has a very particular cost profile: it looks affordable at every individual step and expensive only in aggregate. Nobody can point to the hour lost re-typing an order, or the afternoon lost reconciling two production formats, because those hours are distributed across dozens of people in several cities.

The second cost is decision latency. When it takes days to assemble a view of what production actually did, decisions get made on the last view that was assembled — and in a business with dealers waiting on stock, a week-old picture is a week of the wrong instructions.

And the third is trust. Once a dealer has had an order go missing, they start confirming by phone as well, which puts the manual step back in even after the system exists.

What we built

One cloud platform, six workflows

  • Dealer order management — dealers place orders directly online, removing the re-keying step entirely
  • Best dealer reward system with automated scoring, calculated from activity already in the system
  • Production reporting across all manufacturing centres, in one consistent format
  • Document management and photo gallery, so specifications, records and site photographs belong to the organisation rather than to a laptop
  • HR modules — leave application workflow, onboarding and resignation, handled the same way in every city
  • Payslip printing and incentive calculation, run from the same employee records the rest of the system uses

Why the dealer reward system matters more than it sounds

Automated scoring turns a recognition programme into a live incentive. When dealers can see that their ordering behaviour is being measured consistently and scored on the same basis as everyone else's, the programme starts changing behaviour rather than just rewarding it after the fact. It also removes the awkward part — nobody has to defend a subjective ranking.

Result

The whole operational workflow in one place

Ordering, rewards, production, documents and HR now run on a single cloud-based platform reachable from every branch and every production centre. Head office reads one system rather than assembling several.

How we would sequence this for you

Not all at once. A portal of this size is best built one module at a time, starting with the workflow whose manual version costs the most — usually dealer ordering, because it touches revenue directly and gives the people outside the company a reason to log in. Each subsequent module then lands on a platform people are already using, which is most of the adoption problem solved before you start. That is exactly what our pilot build is for.

Tech stack: PHP · MySQL · Cloud Hosting

Running a multi-location operation on spreadsheets and phone calls?

We build operations portals that unify dealer ordering, production reporting, documents and HR into one system — starting with a single fixed-price module so you can judge us on working software.

Operations & dealer portalsMulti-location, cloud hostedHR & payroll workflowsPilot project available

Keep reading

More case studies

🚀
Web Performance & CRO

Sitecore Frontend: Tens of Leads to ~1,000 a Day

🇬🇧 Leading Home Improvement Company, UK

An ongoing retainership managing the full frontend of a high-traffic Sitecore enterprise CMS — landing pages, lead forms, schema, CDN and continuous split testing.

Read the case study →
📊
Custom Software

Custom CRM Handling 1,000 Leads a Day

🇬🇧 Leading Home Improvement Company, UK

A CRM and admin backend built to absorb ~1,000 leads a day from the main website and affiliate partners, with a live YoY dashboard and a PWA for mobile management.

Read the case study →
🔌
Integrations

e-Procurement System with SAP Ariba Integration

🇮🇳 MRO Supplies Vendor, India

A punch-out catalogue and ordering system for an MRO supplier, reached from inside the buyer's SAP Ariba environment and posting purchase orders straight back to it.

Read the case study →

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Typically a stack of separate habits rather than a single system: dealer orders arriving by phone and WhatsApp, production figures compiled into spreadsheets and emailed in, leave applications on paper, and documents living on whichever machine last touched them. The portal replaces the coordination, not just the storage.
Yes. Dealers log in and place orders directly, which removes the transcription step where a phoned-in order becomes a typed order and occasionally becomes a wrong order.
Dealers are scored automatically against their activity in the system, so the "best dealer" recognition comes out of the same data the business already relies on rather than from a manual exercise at the end of a period.
That was the requirement. The client operates branches across several Indian cities and multiple production centres, and production reporting runs across all of them in one platform.
Because for a manufacturer the workforce is operations. Leave applications, onboarding, resignation, payslip printing and incentive calculation all sit on the same employee record the production side already needs, so separating them into a second system creates two versions of the truth.
This one runs on cloud hosting, which is usually right for a business with sites in several cities — every branch reaches the same system over the internet without a private network between locations.
💬
📞 Call Now 💬 WhatsApp